Toyota C-HR: no years to avoid
Based on 65,380 real MOT tests from DVSA records. Each year is compared against every other car first registered the same year — otherwise the numbers would only tell you that older cars fail more, which you knew.
A car needs its first MOT at three years old, so a recent model has a short record. The C-HR has 4 years of test data — enough to compare it against its contemporaries, not enough to show a trend.
The short answer
No model year stands out as one to avoid. Every year sits within 15% of the failure rate for cars of the same age. The 2019 is the strongest, failing 33% less often than average.
Found a Toyota C-HR you like?
Averages tell you what to expect. Its registration tells you what actually happened — every MOT, every advisory, and whether the mileage adds up.
Every C-HR model year
Shaded rows are the years that differ most from other cars of the same age — worse, better.
| Registered | MOT tests | Fail rate | vs same-age cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 13,974 | 10.7% |
25% better
|
| 2018 | 18,518 | 10.2% |
15% better
|
| 2019 | 17,557 | 6.9% |
33% better
|
| 2020 | 15,331 | 6.2% |
33% better
|
How this is worked out
Every MOT test recorded by DVSA in 2023 on a Toyota C-HR, grouped by the year the car was first registered. Retests are excluded, so a car that failed and was fixed still counts as a failure. Each year's rate is then divided by the rate for all cars first registered that year — so 120 means 20% more failures than its contemporaries, not 20% more than a brand new car.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.