Skoda Kodiaq: which years to avoid
Based on 29,433 real MOT tests from DVSA records. Each year is compared against every other car first registered the same year — otherwise the numbers would only tell you that older cars fail more, which you knew.
A car needs its first MOT at three years old, so a recent model has a short record. The Kodiaq has 4 years of test data — enough to compare it against its contemporaries, not enough to show a trend.
The short answer
No model year stands out as one to avoid. Every year sits within 15% of the failure rate for cars of the same age. The 2017 is the strongest, failing 33% less often than average.
Found a Skoda Kodiaq you like?
Averages tell you what to expect. Its registration tells you what actually happened — every MOT, every advisory, and whether the mileage adds up.
Every Kodiaq model year
Shaded rows are the years that differ most from other cars of the same age — worse, better.
| Registered | MOT tests | Fail rate | vs same-age cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 6,174 | 9.6% |
33% better
|
| 2018 | 7,589 | 8.6% |
28% better
|
| 2019 | 8,820 | 9.4% |
about average
|
| 2020 | 6,850 | 8.2% |
about average
|
How this is worked out
Every MOT test recorded by DVSA in 2023 on a Skoda Kodiaq, grouped by the year the car was first registered. Retests are excluded, so a car that failed and was fixed still counts as a failure. Each year's rate is then divided by the rate for all cars first registered that year — so 120 means 20% more failures than its contemporaries, not 20% more than a brand new car.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.